Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CENT · against 173 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #72 of 174 · scores higher than 59% of peers · safety percentile 70
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)37 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including CENT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CENT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 169 reported | 0.81× | 0.29× | 21% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 173 reported | 0.59 | 0.36 | 22% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 167 reported | 3.79× | 1.81× | 89% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 2 | 3.1B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2.74T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 49 | |
| 4 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 5 | 398.9B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 77 | |
| 68 | 265.7B JPY (≈$1.8B) | 71 | 76 | |
| 69 | 3.9B USD | 71 | 64 | |
| 70 | 10.4B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 70 | 53 | |
| 71 | 1.4B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 70 | 68 | |
| 72 | 2.9B USD | 70 | 57 | |
| 73 | 31.5B CNY (≈$4.4B) | 70 | 75 | |
| 74 | 1.8B USD | 69 | 55 | |
| 75 | 250.8B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 68 | 52 | |
| 76 | 3.5B SGD (≈$2.7B) | 68 | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score