Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CDNL · against 2,436 other Industrials companies
Ranked #376 of 2,437 · scores higher than 85% of peers · safety percentile 85
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)244 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including CDNL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CDNL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 2,360 reported | 0.38× | 0.41× | 52% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 2,360 reported | Not reported | 0.61 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 2,374 reported | 3.59× | 1.62× | 89% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 2 | 79.5B JPY (≈$540M) | 100 | 79 | |
| 3 | 105.3B JPY (≈$716M) | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 38M MYR (≈$8M) | 100 | ||
| 4 | 157M USD | 100 | 35 | |
| 372 | 1.9B CAD (≈$1.4B) | 85 | 62 | |
| 373 | 3.4B CNY (≈$472M) | 85 | 58 | |
| 374 | 1.7B CNY (≈$244M) | 85 | 38 | |
| 375 | 591M USD | 85 | 73 | |
| 376 | 321M USD | 85 | 68 | |
| 377 | Unavailable | 85 | 55 | |
| 378 | 4.7B BRL (≈$845M) | 85 | 67 | |
| 379 | 1.1B SGD (≈$828M) | 84 | 64 | |
| 380 | 120.7B JPY (≈$820M) | 84 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score