Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CDLX · against 508 other Communication Services companies
Ranked #460 of 509 · scores higher than 10% of peers · safety percentile 10
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)51 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including CDLX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CDLX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 468 reported | Not reported | 0.40× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 497 reported | 0.79 | 0.61 | 33% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 498 reported | 1.62× | 1.37× | 57% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.5B KRW (≈$18M) | 100 | 26 | |
| 2 | 82.4B JPY (≈$560M) | 100 | 76 | |
| 3 | 1.08T JPY (≈$7.4B) | 100 | 67 | |
| 4 | 1.62T JPY (≈$11.0B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 5 | 615.0B JPY (≈$4.2B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 456 | 926M USD | 10 | 39 | |
| 457 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.3B HKD (≈$172M) |
| 10 |
| 21 |
| 458 | 388M USD | 10 | 29 |
| 459 | 4.1B CNY (≈$567M) | 10 | 5 |
| 460 | 12M USD | 10 | 6 |
| 461 | 3.1B CNY (≈$436M) | 9 | 25 |
| 462 | 249M USD | 9 | 11 |
| 463 | 39.0B HKD (≈$5.0B) | 9 | 38 |
| 464 | 8.1B HKD (≈$1.0B) | 9 | 51 |