Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.
How Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. stacks up
CCO · against 509 other Communication Services companies
Profitability
59/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #208 of 510 · scores higher than 59% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score51 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including CCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.A mix: stronger return on invested capital and operating margin, but weaker return on assets than most Communication Services peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 86% of peers. Return on assets: -2.8% vs peer median 2.7%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 77% of peers. Operating margin: 18.9% vs peer median 8.2%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 79% of peers. Return on invested capital: 17.2% vs peer median 6.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CCO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 460 reported | 17.2% | 6.0% | 79% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 506 reported | 18.9% | 8.2% | 77% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 496 reported | -2.8% | 2.7% | 14% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 475 reported | Not reported | 5.4% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 513 reported | 54.2% | 46.2% | 62% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CCO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.62T JPY (≈$11.0B) | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 67.5B INR (≈$811M) | 100 | 35 | |
| 3 | 18.2B JPY (≈$124M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 7.9B TWD (≈$244M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 82.5B USD | 99 | 70 | |
| 203 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 60 | 55 | |
| 203 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 60 | 57 | |
| 208 | 28.8B JPY (≈$196M) | 59 | 74 | |
| 208 | 15.5B MYR (≈$3.4B) | 59 | 40 | |
| 208 | 1.2B USD | 59 | 36 | |
| 208 | 6M CAD (≈$4M) | 59 | 34 | |
| 208 | 499M EUR (≈$549M) | 59 | 48 | |
| 213 | 71.8B JPY (≈$489M) | 58 | 64 | |
| 213 | 6.3B CNY (≈$881M) | 58 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score