Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.
How Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. stacks up
CCO · against 142 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Profitability
59/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #53 of 143 · scores higher than 63% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score17 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including CCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.A mix: stronger return on invested capital and operating margin, but weaker return on assets than most Communication Services peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 86% of peers. Return on assets: -2.8% vs peer median 2.7%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 77% of peers. Operating margin: 18.9% vs peer median 8.2%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 79% of peers. Return on invested capital: 17.2% vs peer median 6.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CCO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 130 reported | 17.2% | 5.2% | 80% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 141 reported | 18.9% | 7.3% | 84% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 139 reported | -2.8% | 2.4% | 12% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 132 reported | Not reported | 5.3% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 144 reported | 54.2% | 41.6% | 66% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CCO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 67.5B INR (≈$811M) | 100 | 35 | |
| 2 | 6.3B SEK (≈$635M) | 97 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 97 | 61 | |
| 4 | 598M CHF (≈$688M) | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 1.0B USD | 96 | 87 | |
| 48 | 743M USD | 60 | 67 | |
| 48 | 2.1B USD | 60 | 64 | |
| 48 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 60 | 55 | |
| 48 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 60 | 57 | |
| 53 | 1.2B USD | 59 | 36 | |
| 54 | 6.3B CNY (≈$881M) | 58 | 63 | |
| 55 | 10.8B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 57 | 63 | |
| 55 | 1.57T ARS (≈$1.6B) | 57 | 74 | |
| 57 | 1.4B AUD (≈$892M) | 56 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score