Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CCK · against 156 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #125 of 157 · scores higher than 21% of peers · safety percentile 16
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)21 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including CCK · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CCK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 153 reported | 1.86× | 0.69× | 20% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 158 reported | 0.56 | 0.92 | 73% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 153 reported | 1.05× | 1.45× | 25% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 2 | 9.5B CHF (≈$10.9B) | 96 | 37 | |
| 3 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 4 | 7.8B EUR (≈$8.6B) | 94 | 61 | |
| 5 | 16.1B USD | 93 | 66 | |
| 121 | 7.4B USD | 19 | 67 | |
| 122 | 15.1B USD | 18 | 54 | |
| 123 | 17.0B CAD (≈$12.4B) | 17 | 59 | |
| 124 | 9.8B USD | 16 | 57 | |
| 125 | 13.1B USD | 16 | 56 | |
| 126 | 14.5B USD | 16 | 29 | |
| 127 | 8.7B USD | 15 | 59 | |
| 128 | 13.7B USD | 14 | 54 | |
| 129 | 42.5B BRL (≈$7.6B) | 14 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score