Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CCJ · against 400 other Energy companies
Ranked #196 of 401 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score40 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including CCJ · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
| Metric | CCJ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 383 reported | 7.2% | 9.3% | 40% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 398 reported | 17.8% | 11.7% | 62% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 391 reported | 5.7% | 4.4% | 62% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 384 reported | 5.7% | 10.5% | 32% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 405 reported | 33.8% | 33.2% | 51% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.9B EUR (≈$7.6B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 22.9B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 3 | 6.33T SAR (≈$1.71T) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 400M EUR (≈$440M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 1.6B USD | 99 | 61 | |
| 192 | 4.1B SAR (≈$1.1B) | 52 | 61 | |
| 192 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 4.0B USD |
| 52 |
| 48 |
| 192 | 408M USD | 52 | 55 |
| 192 | 6.1B EUR (≈$6.7B) | 52 | 43 |
| 196 | 31.6B USD | 51 | 56 |
| 196 | 4.7B AUD (≈$3.1B) | 51 | 47 |
| 196 | 58.0B USD | 51 | 48 |
| 196 | 18.2B USD | 51 | 64 |
| 200 | 66.2B HKD (≈$8.5B) | 50 | 68 |