Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc.
How CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. stacks up
CCC · against 346 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
51/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #174 of 347 · scores higher than 49% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score37 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including CCC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Technology peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 66% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.9% vs peer median 2.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 4.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 77% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.8% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CCC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CCC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 342 reported | 0.9% | 2.4% | 25% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 5.5% | 4.4% | 57% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 164 reported | Not reported | 3.1% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 345 reported | 39.3% | 26.0% | 72% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CCC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 1 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 1 | 40.9B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 1 | 100.3B TWD (≈$3.1B) | 98 | 83 | |
| 5 | 31.1B HKD (≈$4.0B) | 97 | 59 | |
| 164 | 2.4B EUR (≈$2.6B) | 52 | 57 | |
| 174 | 36.2B CNY (≈$5.1B) | 51 | 67 | |
| 174 | 17.0B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 51 | 44 | |
| 174 | 128.4B TWD (≈$4.0B) | 51 | 43 | |
| 174 | 4.5B USD | 51 | 60 | |
| 178 | 22.9B HKD (≈$2.9B) | 50 | 68 | |
| 178 | 2.3B USD | 50 | 60 | |
| 180 | 5.20T KRW (≈$3.7B) | 49 | 58 | |
| 180 | 5.9B USD | 49 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score