Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CAVA Group, Inc.
How CAVA Group, Inc. stacks up
CAVA · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
84/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #66 of 356 · scores higher than 80% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score35 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including CAVA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 84?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 91% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -53.2% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 93% of peers. Revenue growth: 26.8% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 94% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 28.7% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CAVA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CAVA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 26.8% | 5.9% | 88% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | -53.2% | 6.2% | 13% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 28.7% | 4.1% | 93% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CAVA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 61 | 19.2B USD | 85 | 29 | |
| 61 | 4.6B USD | 85 | 74 | |
| 66 | 2.7B USD | 84 | 43 | |
| 66 | 16.7B USD | 84 | 54 | |
| 66 | 7.0B USD | 84 | 46 | |
| 66 | 1.3B USD | 84 | 51 | |
| 66 | 3.5B USD | 84 | 41 | |
| 66 | 282M USD | 84 | 63 | |
| 72 | 9.8B USD | 83 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score