Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CAMT · against 329 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #35 of 330 · scores higher than 90% of peers · safety percentile 86
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)29 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including CAMT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CAMT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 317 reported | 0.71× | 0.31× | 22% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 316 reported | 1.59 | 1.03 | 18% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 326 reported | 8.35× | 1.84× | 95% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 2 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 5 | 3.5B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 31 | 863.2B INR (≈$10.4B) | 91 | 78 | |
| 32 | 183.7B TWD (≈$5.7B) | 90 | 50 | |
| 33 | 26.9B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 88 | 56 | |
| 34 | 625.9B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 87 | 69 | |
| 35 | 5.2B USD | 86 | 61 | |
| 36 | 5.4B USD | 86 | 86 | |
| 37 | 3.9B USD | 86 | 76 | |
| 38 | 9.9B USD | 86 | 56 | |
| 39 | 24.4B CNY (≈$3.4B) | 86 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score