Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cardinal Health, Inc.
How Cardinal Health, Inc. stacks up
CAH · against 454 other Healthcare companies listed in US-listed
Growth
56/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #266 of 455 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score45 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including CAH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 12.7% vs peer median 9.8%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 7.4% vs peer median 5.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 70% of peers. Revenue growth: 14.2% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CAH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CAH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 475 reported | 14.2% | 11.0% | 57% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 171 reported | 12.7% | 21.2% | 42% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 433 reported | 7.4% | 11.0% | 41% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CAH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 464M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 2 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 90M USD | 99 | 27 | |
| 262 | 7.2B USD | 57 | 43 | |
| 262 | 11.6B USD | 57 | 56 | |
| 262 | 1.1B USD | 57 | 43 | |
| 262 | 302.7B USD | 57 | 63 | |
| 266 | 58.6B USD | 56 | 52 | |
| 266 | 879M USD | 56 | 36 | |
| 266 | 5.8B USD | 56 | 38 | |
| 266 | 2.0B USD | 56 | 26 | |
| 266 | 22.6B USD | 56 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score