Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CAAP · against 2,436 other Industrials companies
Ranked #1,546 of 2,437 · scores higher than 37% of peers · safety percentile 37
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)244 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including CAAP · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CAAP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 2,360 reported | 0.56× | 0.41× | 41% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 2,360 reported | 0.73 | 0.61 | 40% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 2,374 reported | 1.51× | 1.62× | 44% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 2 | 79.5B JPY (≈$540M) | 100 | 79 | |
| 3 | 105.3B JPY (≈$716M) | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 38M MYR (≈$8M) | 100 | ||
| 4 | 157M USD | 100 | 35 | |
| 1,542 | 1.7B CHF (≈$1.9B) | 37 | 29 | |
| 1,543 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 270M USD |
| 37 |
| 41 |
| 1,544 | 4.6B CNY (≈$651M) | 37 | 30 |
| 1,545 | 2.1B CNY (≈$299M) | 37 | 10 |
| 1,546 | 3.9B USD | 37 | 67 |
| 1,547 | 355M MYR (≈$78M) | 37 | 20 |
| 1,548 | 15.6B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 36 | 43 |
| 1,549 | 1.9B CHF (≈$2.2B) | 36 | 54 |
| 1,550 | 21.5B TWD (≈$666M) | 36 | 51 |