Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Boyd Gaming Corporation
How Boyd Gaming Corporation stacks up
BYD · against 275 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
89/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #41 of 276 · scores higher than 84% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score38 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including BYD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 89?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 66% of peers. Return on invested capital: 11.1% vs peer median 7.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 86% of peers. Operating margin: 16.4% vs peer median 6.4%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 99% of peers. Return on assets: 27.2% vs peer median 3.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BYD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BYD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 262 reported | 11.1% | 10.2% | 56% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 276 reported | 16.4% | 9.1% | 81% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 261 reported | 27.2% | 4.4% | 99% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 248 reported | 93.1% | 12.1% | 97% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 278 reported | 59.1% | 31.0% | 89% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BYD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 106.7B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 3 | 4.6B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 35 | 3.9B USD | 91 | 56 | |
| 35 | 4.2B USD | 91 | 56 | |
| 39 | 7.4B USD | 90 | 64 | |
| 39 | 6.2B USD | 90 | 69 | |
| 41 | 5.6B USD | 89 | 69 | |
| 41 | 8.9B USD | 89 | 53 | |
| 41 | 5.6B USD | 89 | 47 | |
| 41 | 2.9B USD | 89 | 60 | |
| 45 | 7.29T KRW (≈$5.2B) | 88 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score