Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to BrightSpire Capital, Inc.
How BrightSpire Capital, Inc. stacks up
BRSP · against 217 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
32/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #140 of 218 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score19 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including BRSP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 32?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -6.1% vs peer median 5.3%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.7% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BRSP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BRSP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 237 reported | -6.9% | 5.6% | 16% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 220 reported | 5.7% | 5.3% | 54% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 82 reported | 19.4% | 9.8% | 78% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 241 reported | 195.6% | 123.0% | 75% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BRSP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 1 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 1 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | 9.23T IDR (≈$572M) | 99 | 88 | |
| 1 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 137 | 859M USD | 33 | 55 | |
| 137 | 1.0B SGD (≈$782M) | 33 | 53 | |
| 140 | 3.2B HKD (≈$415M) | 32 | 29 | |
| 140 | 66.3B JPY (≈$451M) | 32 | 42 | |
| 140 | 440M USD | 32 | 27 | |
| 140 | 795M USD | 32 | 48 | |
| 144 | 578M USD | 30 | 32 | |
| 145 | 11.3B TWD (≈$351M) | 28 | 25 | |
| 145 | 1.1B AUD (≈$737M) | 28 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score