Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Brightstar Lottery PLC
How Brightstar Lottery PLC stacks up
BRSL · against 438 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #182 of 439 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score48 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including BRSL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -22.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 68% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.1% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 86% of peers. Earnings yield: 8.0% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BRSL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BRSL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 436 reported | 9.9% | 5.6% | 86% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 447 reported | 12.1% | 9.6% | 65% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 148 reported | -123.9% | 6.5% | 1% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 438 reported | 46.6% | 56.1% | 43% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BRSL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 151.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 177 | 81.8B THB (≈$2.3B) | 63 | 52 | |
| 177 | 3.0B AUD (≈$2.0B) | 63 | 45 | |
| 182 | 7.9B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 62 | 63 | |
| 182 | 7.4B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 62 | 50 | |
| 182 | 1.8B USD | 62 | 39 | |
| 182 | 3.3B USD | 62 | 33 | |
| 182 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 62 | 41 | |
| 187 | 8.1B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 61 | 64 | |
| 187 | 4.5B SAR (≈$1.2B) | 61 | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score