Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BNGO · against 26 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #18 of 27 · scores higher than 35% of peers · safety percentile 28
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)4 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including BNGO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, which is weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BNGO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 22 reported | 0.21× | 0.16× | 43% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 26 reported | 1.66 | 0.74 | 16% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 27 reported | 2.48× | 2.69× | 46% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 276M SEK (≈$28M) | 96 | 48 | |
| 2 | 31M USD | 91 | ||
| 3 | 298M SEK (≈$30M) | 83 | 48 | |
| 4 | 22M USD | 81 | 47 | |
| 5 | 2.8B JPY (≈$19M) | 78 | ||
| 14 | 34M USD | 42 | 19 | |
| 15 | 27M USD | 38 | 24 | |
| 16 | 3.5B JPY (≈$24M) | 38 | 48 | |
| 17 | 14.3B KRW (≈$10M) | 32 | 53 | |
| 18 | 17M USD | 28 | 18 | |
| 19 | 110M HKD (≈$14M) | 27 | 28 | |
| 20 | 12M USD | 24 | 38 | |
| 21 | 252M HKD (≈$32M) | 21 | 17 | |
| 22 | 21.3B KRW (≈$15M) | 16 | 28 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score