Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BMRN · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #775 of 1,373 · scores higher than 44% of peers · safety percentile 44
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including BMRN · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta, but weaker debt / equity than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BMRN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.66× | 0.24× | 25% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 0.21 | 0.53 | 77% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 2.39× | 2.62× | 47% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 771 | 211M MYR (≈$46M) | 44 | 65 | |
| 772 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 6.1B HKD (≈$786M) |
| 44 |
| 52 |
| 773 | 5.3B TWD (≈$165M) | 44 | 69 |
| 774 | 596.9B INR (≈$7.2B) | 44 | 58 |
| 775 | 10.8B USD | 44 | 41 |
| 776 | 26.6B CNY (≈$3.7B) | 44 | 57 |
| 777 | 592M ILS (≈$160M) | 43 | 84 |
| 778 | 759M USD | 43 | 54 |
| 779 | 838M EUR (≈$922M) | 43 | 71 |