Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BME · against 398 other Financial Services companies
Ranked #168 of 399 · scores higher than 58% of peers · safety percentile 58
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including BME · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker current ratio than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BME | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 349 reported | 0.00× | 0.57× | 96% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 394 reported | 0.59 | 0.67 | 60% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 372 reported | 0.81× | 2.04× | 13% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 344M MYR (≈$76M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 3 | 24.8B JPY (≈$168M) | 99 | 25 | |
| 4 | 0M MYR (≈$0M) | 99 | ||
| 5 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 164 | 203M EUR (≈$224M) | 59 | 52 | |
| 165 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 90.9B JPY (≈$618M) |
| 59 |
| 70 |
| 166 | 481M USD | 59 |
| 167 | 843M USD | 58 |
| 168 | 603M USD | 58 |
| 169 | 9.1B EUR (≈$10.0B) | 58 | 32 |
| 170 | 241M EUR (≈$265M) | 58 | 55 |
| 171 | 23.7B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 57 | 59 |
| 172 | 400M USD | 57 |