Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Baker Hughes Company
How Baker Hughes Company stacks up
BKR · against 36 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #16 of 37 · scores higher than 56% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score4 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including BKR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 0.9% vs peer median 1.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 0.4% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 72% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 6.0% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BKR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BKR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 37 reported | 0.4% | 2.5% | 44% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 37 reported | 0.9% | 2.9% | 44% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 37 reported | 6.0% | -1.1% | 81% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BKR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 31.6B USD | 96 | 56 | |
| 2 | 33.9B USD | 91 | 71 | |
| 2 | 58.0B USD | 91 | 48 | |
| 4 | 60.4B USD | 89 | 77 | |
| 5 | 69.4B USD | 82 | 49 | |
| 12 | 30.5B USD | 62 | 57 | |
| 12 | 52.4B USD | 62 | 57 | |
| 14 | 404.0B BRL (≈$72.7B) | 61 | 39 | |
| 14 | 66.1B USD | 61 | 45 | |
| 16 | 52.4B USD | 57 | 47 | |
| 16 | 2.51T INR (≈$30.2B) | 57 | 76 | |
| 18 | 64.0B USD | 56 | 37 | |
| 19 | 2.92T INR (≈$35.0B) | 50 | 56 | |
| 20 | 904.0B TWD (≈$28.0B) | 49 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score