Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Black Hills Corporation
How Black Hills Corporation stacks up
BKH · against 83 other Utilities companies of similar size
Growth
34/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #54 of 84 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score13 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including BKH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, which is weaker than most Utilities peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 76% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -3.8% vs peer median 2.0%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 0.5% vs peer median 1.7%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.5% vs peer median 2.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BKH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BKH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 84 reported | 2.5% | 1.3% | 55% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 72 reported | 0.5% | 3.5% | 48% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 84 reported | -3.8% | 1.4% | 25% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BKH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 48.3B BRL (≈$8.7B) | 100 | 69 | |
| 1 | 9.1B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 98 | 77 | |
| 4 | 9.1B EUR (≈$10.0B) | 96 | 61 | |
| 4 | 921.0B INR (≈$11.1B) | 96 | 60 | |
| 51 | 10.1B USD | 37 | 46 | |
| 52 | 49.2B HKD (≈$6.3B) | 36 | 50 | |
| 52 | 59.6B CNY (≈$8.3B) | 36 | 44 | |
| 54 | 4.5B EUR (≈$4.9B) | 34 | 43 | |
| 54 | 6.3B USD | 34 | 38 | |
| 56 | 47.0B CNY (≈$6.6B) | 33 | 48 | |
| 56 | 606.3B INR (≈$7.3B) | 33 | 48 | |
| 58 | 962.3B JPY (≈$6.5B) | 31 | 50 | |
| 58 | 44.2B CNY (≈$6.2B) | 31 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score