Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BGS · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #742 of 802 · scores higher than 7% of peers · safety percentile 7
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)81 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including BGS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BGS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 6.52× | 0.44× | 1% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.57 | 0.32 | 23% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 1.62× | 1.53× | 54% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 738 | 29.1B AUD (≈$19.2B) | 8 | 37 | |
| 739 | 1.8B CNY (≈$252M) | 8 | 9 | |
| 740 | 1.0B MYR (≈$226M) | 8 | 44 | |
| 741 | 884M BRL (≈$159M) | 8 | 65 | |
| 742 | 194M USD | 7 | 26 | |
| 743 | 9.8B EUR (≈$10.7B) | 7 | 36 | |
| 744 | 6.6B CHF (≈$7.6B) | 7 | 47 | |
| 745 | 925M USD | 7 | 49 | |
| 746 | 39.5B USD | 7 | 26 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score