Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BGS · against 162 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #152 of 163 · scores higher than 7% of peers · safety percentile 7
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)16 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including BGS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BGS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 161 reported | 6.52× | 0.49× | 1% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 164 reported | 0.57 | 0.29 | 22% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 168 reported | 1.62× | 1.63× | 50% | 33% |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score