Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc.
How Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. stacks up
BFAM · against 368 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
65/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #133 of 369 · scores higher than 63% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score38 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including BFAM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 65?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 61% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.2% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 64% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.8% vs peer median 4.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 66% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.1% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BFAM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BFAM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 368 reported | 5.9% | 5.4% | 59% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 377 reported | 10.6% | 9.6% | 58% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 148 reported | 9.1% | 6.2% | 69% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 370 reported | 36.0% | 45.7% | 40% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BFAM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 3 | 248.4B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 4 | 9.3B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 4 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 132 | 27.3B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 66 | 72 | |
| 133 | 50.3B TWD (≈$1.6B) | 65 | 66 | |
| 133 | 537.3B JPY (≈$3.7B) | 65 | 70 | |
| 133 | 69.3B TWD (≈$2.1B) | 65 | 57 | |
| 133 | 2.6B USD | 65 | 54 | |
| 133 | 2.5B GBP (≈$3.3B) | 65 | 68 | |
| 133 | 1.9B USD | 65 | 55 | |
| 133 | 2.3B EUR (≈$2.6B) | 65 | 53 | |
| 140 | 12.1B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 64 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score