Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Bel Fuse Inc.
How Bel Fuse Inc. stacks up
BELFA · against 496 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
53/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #217 of 497 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score55 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including BELFA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.1% vs peer median 2.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.6% vs peer median 2.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.7% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BELFA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BELFA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 495 reported | 2.1% | 1.9% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 499 reported | 5.7% | 4.0% | 63% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 465 reported | 2.6% | 3.3% | 42% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 490 reported | 32.8% | 22.1% | 64% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BELFA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 5 | 662M USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 213 | 1.9B USD | 54 | 41 | |
| 213 | 862M USD | 54 | 58 | |
| 213 | 3.8B USD | 54 | 74 | |
| 213 | 265.8B USD | 54 | 68 | |
| 217 | 2.8B USD | 53 | 70 | |
| 217 | 15.0B USD | 53 | 51 | |
| 217 | 13.0B USD | 53 | 68 | |
| 217 | 3.87T USD | 53 | 66 | |
| 217 | 4.99T USD | 53 | 78 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score