Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BDX · against 60 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #30 of 61 · scores higher than 52% of peers · safety percentile 32
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)11 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including BDX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | BDX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 58 reported | 0.69× | 0.51× | 33% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 58 reported | 0.28 | 0.72 | 74% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 58 reported | 0.86× | 1.74× | 9% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 327.3B CNY (≈$45.8B) | 92 | 75 | |
| 2 | 56.7B USD | 85 | 79 | |
| 3 | 8.24T JPY (≈$56.0B) | 83 | 75 | |
| 4 | 2.67T INR (≈$32.1B) | 82 | 68 | |
| 5 | 4.25T INR (≈$51.0B) | 81 | 70 | |
| 26 | 64.8B EUR (≈$71.3B) | 35 | 51 | |
| 27 | 4.61T JPY (≈$31.3B) | 35 | 76 | |
| 28 | 63.0B USD | 34 | 65 | |
| 29 | 36.8B USD | 34 | 46 | |
| 30 | 54.0B USD | 32 | 47 | |
| 31 | 38.4B USD | 31 | 50 | |
| 32 | 45.6B CHF (≈$52.4B) | 30 | 55 | |
| 33 | 45.2B USD | 30 | 46 | |
| 34 | 78.1B USD | 30 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score