Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Belden Inc.
How Belden Inc. stacks up
BDC · against 360 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #224 of 361 · scores higher than 37% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score40 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including BDC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.5% vs peer median 4.8%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 10.0% vs peer median 11.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 9.4% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BDC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BDC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 362 reported | 9.4% | 10.8% | 45% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 246 reported | 10.0% | 12.4% | 46% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 359 reported | 2.5% | 6.2% | 36% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BDC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 3 | 21.5B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 37.9B CNY (≈$5.3B) | 99 | 58 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 83 | |
| 219 | 5.9B USD | 46 | 55 | |
| 224 | 35.9B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 45 | 60 | |
| 224 | 161.3B TWD (≈$5.0B) | 45 | 57 | |
| 224 | 3.2B USD | 45 | 67 | |
| 224 | 4.2B USD | 45 | 54 | |
| 224 | 5.2B USD | 45 | 61 | |
| 224 | 4.0B USD | 45 | 46 | |
| 230 | 625.9B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 44 | 69 | |
| 230 | 5.4B EUR (≈$5.9B) | 44 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score