Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
How Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. stacks up
BBW · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
34/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #265 of 356 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score32 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including BBW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 68% of peers. Revenue growth: -0.9% vs peer median 3.7%
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -7.2% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.6% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BBW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BBW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | -0.9% | 5.9% | 21% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | -7.2% | 6.2% | 36% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 2.6% | 4.1% | 41% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BBW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 258 | 119.4B USD | 37 | 39 | |
| 258 | 228.5B USD | 37 | 40 | |
| 258 | 499M USD | 37 | 72 | |
| 264 | 459M USD | 35 | 38 | |
| 265 | 362M USD | 34 | 62 | |
| 265 | 335M USD | 34 | 56 | |
| 265 | 4.8B USD | 34 | 35 | |
| 265 | 13.9B USD | 34 | 44 | |
| 269 | 4.6B USD | 33 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score