Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
How Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. stacks up
BBBY · against 84 other Miscellaneous companies
Growth
4/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #82 of 85 · scores higher than 4% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score8 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including BBBY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 4?
Weighted metrics compared with all Miscellaneous companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Miscellaneous peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 95% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -18.5% vs peer median 3.4%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 93% of peers. Revenue growth: -25.1% vs peer median 5.8%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BBBY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BBBY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 88 reported | -25.1% | 5.8% | 7% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 46 reported | Not reported | 12.6% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 79 reported | -18.5% | 3.4% | 5% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BBBY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | ||
| 2 | 1.35T KRW (≈$975M) | 99 | ||
| 3 | 6.6B USD | 98 | ||
| 4 | 506M GBP (≈$658M) | 96 | ||
| 5 | 14.1B USD | 95 | ||
| 78 | 164.8B KRW (≈$119M) | 8 | ||
| 79 | 7.09T KRW (≈$5.1B) | 7 | ||
| 80 | 1.6B CAD (≈$1.2B) | 6 | ||
| 81 | 1.53T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 5 | ||
| 82 | 415M USD | 4 | ||
| 83 | 99.2B KRW (≈$71M) | 2 | ||
| 84 | 33.4B KRW (≈$24M) | 0 | ||
| 84 | 93.5B KRW (≈$67M) | 0 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score