Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
How Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. stacks up
BBBY · against 23 other Miscellaneous companies of similar size
Growth
4/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #24 of 24 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score1 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including BBBY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 4?
Weighted metrics compared with all Miscellaneous companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Miscellaneous peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 95% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -18.5% vs peer median 3.4%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 93% of peers. Revenue growth: -25.1% vs peer median 5.8%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BBBY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BBBY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 24 reported | -25.1% | 13.7% | 0% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 16 reported | Not reported | 0.5% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 22 reported | -18.5% | 7.2% | 5% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BBBY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 506M GBP (≈$658M) | 96 | ||
| 2 | 331.6B KRW (≈$239M) | 92 | ||
| 3 | 798M CAD (≈$582M) | 88 | ||
| 4 | 607.8B KRW (≈$438M) | 83 | ||
| 5 | 372.8B KRW (≈$268M) | 80 | ||
| 20 | 1.1B CAD (≈$770M) | 19 | ||
| 21 | 393.6B KRW (≈$283M) | 18 | ||
| 22 | 310.2B KRW (≈$223M) | 15 | ||
| 23 | 336.4B KRW (≈$242M) | 12 | ||
| 24 | 415M USD | 4 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score