Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ball Corporation
How Ball Corporation stacks up
BALL · against 129 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
50/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #57 of 130 · scores higher than 56% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including BALL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.9% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.7% vs peer median 8.8%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.7% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BALL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BALL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 128 reported | 5.6% | 4.6% | 66% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 132 reported | 8.7% | 7.8% | 58% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 71 reported | 4.9% | 5.6% | 47% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 125 reported | 34.4% | 26.4% | 60% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BALL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 2 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 4 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 5 | 70.6B CNY (≈$9.9B) | 92 | 52 | |
| 53 | 1.27T JPY (≈$8.7B) | 52 | 63 | |
| 54 | 3.33T JPY (≈$22.7B) | 51 | 47 | |
| 54 | 15.4B USD | 51 | 74 | |
| 54 | 13.9B USD | 51 | 44 | |
| 57 | 16.7B USD | 50 | 54 | |
| 57 | 8.7B USD | 50 | 59 | |
| 59 | 9.8B USD | 49 | 57 | |
| 59 | 18.6B USD | 49 | 43 | |
| 59 | 10.2B USD | 49 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score