Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Braskem S.A.
How Braskem S.A. stacks up
BAK · against 221 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #84 of 222 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score25 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including BAK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker free cash flow yield than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -375.4% vs peer median 2.6%
- Earnings yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 71% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.9% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BAK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BAK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 211 reported | Not reported | 3.0% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 216 reported | 12.9% | 8.9% | 69% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 196 reported | -375.4% | 2.3% | 0% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 212 reported | Not reported | 45.5% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BAK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 1 | 768M USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 3 | 5.3B USD | 98 | 81 | |
| 4 | 7.9B USD | 96 | 62 | |
| 5 | 6.2B USD | 95 | 77 | |
| 80 | 2.6B USD | 59 | 45 | |
| 80 | 3.6B USD | 59 | 43 | |
| 82 | 5.9B USD | 58 | 53 | |
| 82 | 182M USD | 58 | 53 | |
| 84 | 442M USD | 57 | 38 | |
| 84 | 8.3B USD | 57 | 66 | |
| 84 | 27.0B USD | 57 | 54 | |
| 87 | 5.4B USD | 56 | 68 | |
| 87 | 4.0B USD | 56 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score