Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Aura Minerals Inc.
How Aura Minerals Inc. stacks up
AUGO · against 1,320 other Basic Materials companies
Valuation
56/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #576 of 1,321 · scores higher than 56% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score132 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including AUGO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.7% vs peer median 3.6%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 76% of peers. EBITDA yield: 14.1% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AUGO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AUGO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,281 reported | 5.5% | 3.8% | 62% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,352 reported | 14.1% | 8.6% | 76% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 409 reported | Not reported | 2.6% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,275 reported | 8.5% | 61.0% | 4% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AUGO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 577.1B KRW (≈$416M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 219M MYR (≈$48M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 63M MYR (≈$14M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 576 | 42.5B JPY (≈$289M) | 56 | 52 | |
| 576 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score