Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AZZ · against 2,436 other Industrials companies
Ranked #1,431 of 2,437 · scores higher than 41% of peers · safety percentile 41
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)243 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including AZZ · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AZZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 2,360 reported | 0.39× | 0.41× | 51% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 2,360 reported | 1.13 | 0.61 | 17% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 2,374 reported | 1.92× | 1.62× | 62% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 2 | 79.5B JPY (≈$540M) | 100 | 79 | |
| 3 | 105.3B JPY (≈$716M) | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 38M MYR (≈$8M) | 100 | ||
| 4 | 157M USD | 100 | 35 | |
| 1,427 | 2.5B CNY (≈$355M) | 41 | 27 | |
| 1,428 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 9.5B TWD (≈$293M) |
| 41 |
| 40 |
| 1,429 | 7.82T JPY (≈$53.2B) | 41 | 40 |
| 1,430 | 17.3B USD | 41 | 56 |
| 1,431 | 4.2B USD | 41 | 55 |
| 1,432 | 13.4B USD | 41 | 62 |
| 1,433 | 6.6B CNY (≈$926M) | 41 | 35 |
| 1,434 | 4.8B CNY (≈$672M) | 41 | 24 |
| 1,435 | 323.6B JPY (≈$2.2B) | 41 | 64 |