Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to AZZ Inc.
How AZZ Inc. stacks up
AZZ · against 506 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #339 of 507 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score61 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including AZZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.A mix: stronger revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Industrials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 82% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -29.2% vs peer median 7.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.2% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 68% of peers. Revenue growth: 9.5% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AZZ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AZZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 508 reported | 9.5% | 7.0% | 63% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 439 reported | -29.2% | 9.2% | 16% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 504 reported | 5.2% | 6.5% | 43% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AZZ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 58 | |
| 335 | 5.0B USD | 44 | 53 | |
| 335 | 3.4B USD | 44 | 66 | |
| 335 | 4.8B EUR (≈$5.3B) | 44 | 57 | |
| 339 | 51.3B CNY (≈$7.2B) | 43 | 53 | |
| 339 | 4.2B USD | 43 | 55 | |
| 339 | 93.6B THB (≈$2.6B) | 43 | 39 | |
| 339 | 215.4B INR (≈$2.6B) | 43 | 81 | |
| 339 | 34.6B SEK (≈$3.5B) | 43 | 52 | |
| 339 | 11.4B AUD (≈$7.5B) | 43 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score