Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to AutoZone, Inc.
How AutoZone, Inc. stacks up
AZO · against 54 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
59/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #37 of 55 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score5 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including AZO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.2% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 66% of peers. Revenue growth: 7.4% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AZO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AZO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 55 reported | 7.4% | 8.6% | 43% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 49 reported | Not reported | 5.6% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 55 reported | 5.2% | 10.2% | 22% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AZO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 3 | 38.3B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 4 | 73.8B EUR (≈$81.2B) | 98 | 58 | |
| 5 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 97 | 75 | |
| 33 | 81.9B USD | 62 | 45 | |
| 34 | 5.71T JPY (≈$38.8B) | 61 | 82 | |
| 34 | 39.3B USD | 61 | 53 | |
| 34 | 42.1B USD | 61 | 58 | |
| 37 | 51.5B USD | 59 | 50 | |
| 38 | 198.5B CNY (≈$27.8B) | 57 | 70 | |
| 38 | 27.4B USD | 57 | 23 | |
| 40 | 44.1B USD | 52 | 35 | |
| 41 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 50 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score