Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
How Armstrong World Industries, Inc. stacks up
AWI · against 472 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
50/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #178 of 473 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score62 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including AWI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.3% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.4% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.4% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AWI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AWI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 468 reported | 4.3% | 3.0% | 70% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | 5.8% | 6.3% | 43% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 430 reported | 3.4% | 3.3% | 51% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 466 reported | 12.2% | 32.3% | 19% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AWI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 167 | 3.5B USD | 51 | 49 | |
| 167 | 53.7B USD | 51 | 56 | |
| 167 | 8.7B USD | 51 | 59 | |
| 167 | 12.9B USD | 51 | 60 | |
| 178 | 7.2B USD | 50 | 60 | |
| 178 | 34.2B USD | 50 | 40 | |
| 178 | 8.0B USD | 50 | 48 | |
| 178 | 10.1B USD | 50 | 62 | |
| 182 | Unavailable | 49 | 22 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score