Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AUR · against 204 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #200 of 205 · scores higher than 1% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score7 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including AUR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | AUR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 201 reported | -10.8% | 4.9% | 1% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 207 reported | -12.7% | 8.6% | 0% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 113 reported | -8.8% | 6.3% | 3% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 201 reported | 22.9% | 32.2% | 39% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 5 | 6.99T KRW (≈$5.0B) | 95 | 78 | |
| 194 | 15.2B USD | 14 | 36 | |
| 197 | 8.8B USD | 12 | 55 | |
| 198 | 15.2B USD | 10 | 57 | |
| 199 | 11.5B EUR (≈$12.7B) | 9 | 28 | |
| 200 | 8.6B USD | 6 | 41 | |
| 200 | 8.0B USD | 6 | 26 | |
| 200 | 16.9B USD | 6 | 11 | |
| 200 | 7.5B USD | 6 | 25 | |
| 204 | 33.1B CNY (≈$4.6B) | 5 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score