Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ATOS · against 29 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #9 of 30 · scores higher than 72% of peers · safety percentile 58
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)3 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including ATOS · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ATOS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 26 reported | Not reported | 0.19× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 30 reported | 1.27 | 0.79 | 28% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 31 reported | 5.69× | 2.48× | 83% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 276M SEK (≈$28M) | 96 | 48 | |
| 2 | 31M USD | 91 | ||
| 3 | 298M SEK (≈$30M) | 83 | 48 | |
| 4 | 22M USD | 81 | 47 | |
| 5 | 2.8B JPY (≈$19M) | 78 | ||
| 6 | 22M AUD (≈$15M) | 73 | 25 | |
| 7 | 250M SEK (≈$25M) | 65 | 44 | |
| 8 | 30M USD | 60 | ||
| 9 | 23M USD | 58 | ||
| 10 | 271M SEK (≈$27M) | 56 | 41 | |
| 11 | 216M HKD (≈$28M) | 55 | ||
| 12 | 158M ILS (≈$43M) | 48 | ||
| 13 | 37M USD | 47 | 21 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score