Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ACET · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #548 of 1,373 · scores higher than 60% of peers · safety percentile 60
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including ACET · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio and debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ACET | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.11× | 0.24× | 66% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 1.59 | 0.53 | 10% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 6.71× | 2.62× | 81% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 544 | 5.9B HKD (≈$758M) | 60 | 60 | |
| 545 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 3.5B CNY (≈$487M) |
| 60 |
| 25 |
| 546 | 2.8B CNY (≈$392M) | 60 | 42 |
| 547 | 2.7B CNY (≈$383M) | 60 | 24 |
| 548 | 30M USD | 60 |
| 549 | 6.4B CNY (≈$894M) | 60 | 60 |
| 550 | 1.8B USD | 60 | 80 |
| 551 | 2.1B CNY (≈$290M) | 60 | 27 |
| 552 | 5.3B USD | 60 | 50 |