Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ATI Inc.
How ATI Inc. stacks up
ATI · against 173 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
52/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #101 of 174 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score24 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including ATI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.6% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 61% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 15.4% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ATI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ATI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 175 reported | 4.6% | 6.8% | 37% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 157 reported | 15.4% | 10.6% | 60% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 173 reported | 4.5% | 6.5% | 39% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ATI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.22T INR (≈$14.6B) | 99 | 72 | |
| 2 | 18.35T KRW (≈$13.2B) | 97 | 56 | |
| 2 | 1.39T INR (≈$16.7B) | 97 | 54 | |
| 4 | 22.7B USD | 96 | 41 | |
| 5 | 63.3B CAD (≈$46.2B) | 95 | 56 | |
| 99 | 173.2B CNY (≈$24.2B) | 53 | 58 | |
| 99 | 28.4B USD | 53 | 55 | |
| 101 | 4.15T JPY (≈$28.2B) | 52 | 57 | |
| 101 | 2.02T JPY (≈$13.8B) | 52 | 27 | |
| 101 | 24.6B USD | 52 | 49 | |
| 104 | 17.5B USD | 51 | 60 | |
| 104 | 17.0B CHF (≈$19.6B) | 51 | 48 | |
| 104 | 25.6B USD | 51 | 50 | |
| 107 | 90.4B CNY (≈$12.7B) | 50 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score