Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Anterix Inc.
How Anterix Inc. stacks up
ATEX · against 470 other Communication Services companies
Valuation
11/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #417 of 471 · scores higher than 11% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score42 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including ATEX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 11?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -2.7% vs peer median 8.6%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 85% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 0.7% vs peer median 7.4%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -1.5% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ATEX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ATEX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 461 reported | 4.3% | 3.0% | 57% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 493 reported | -2.7% | 8.7% | 9% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 227 reported | -1.2% | 7.6% | 15% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 467 reported | 17.8% | 48.9% | 20% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ATEX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 105.8B KRW (≈$76M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 694.0B KRW (≈$500M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2.6B HKD (≈$329M) | 99 | 80 | |
| 3 | 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 226M SEK (≈$23M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 413 | 11.8B JPY (≈$80M) | 12 | 44 | |
| 413 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score