Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ASML Holding N.V.
How ASML Holding N.V. stacks up
ASML · against 12 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
35/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #11 of 13 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score2 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including ASML · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 35?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 2.4% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 1.8% vs peer median 2.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.1% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ASML, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ASML | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 11 reported | 2.6% | 3.2% | 30% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 13 reported | 3.1% | 6.6% | 17% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 13 reported | 3.9% | 3.1% | 58% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 7 reported | Not reported | 10.4% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ASML| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 803.7B EUR (≈$884.1B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 2 | 1429.37T KRW (≈$1.03T) | 97 | 76 | |
| 2 | 1.08T USD | 97 | 84 | |
| 4 | 994.08T KRW (≈$715.7B) | 95 | 81 | |
| 5 | 965.7B USD | 89 | 84 | |
| 7 | 382.5B USD | 62 | 55 | |
| 8 | 406.0B USD | 51 | 54 | |
| 9 | 303.1B USD | 43 | 58 | |
| 10 | 320.1B USD | 37 | 28 | |
| 11 | 598.2B USD | 35 | 60 | |
| 12 | 790.0B USD | 24 | 56 | |
| 13 | 421.5B USD | 22 | 78 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score