Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ashland Inc.
How Ashland Inc. stacks up
ASH · against 1,333 other Basic Materials companies
Profitability
37/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #835 of 1,334 · scores higher than 37% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score133 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including ASH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 37?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 65% of peers. Return on assets: 1.1% vs peer median 2.5%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 64% of peers. Return on invested capital: 3.9% vs peer median 6.7%
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 7.4% vs peer median 7.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ASH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ASH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,260 reported | 3.9% | 6.7% | 36% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,304 reported | 7.4% | 7.6% | 49% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,270 reported | 1.1% | 2.5% | 35% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,254 reported | 4.0% | 5.5% | 43% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,372 reported | 33.4% | 21.5% | 71% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ASH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 387.1B INR (≈$4.6B) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 2.22T INR (≈$26.7B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 583.2B INR (≈$7.0B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 4 | 49.8B HKD (≈$6.4B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 4 | 1.9B MYR (≈$416M) | 98 | 81 | |
| 835 | 14.1B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score