Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ASAN · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,644 of 1,698 · scores higher than 3% of peers · safety percentile 3
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including ASAN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ASAN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 2.48× | 0.26× | 4% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.19 | 0.84 | 29% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 0.92× | 1.83× | 9% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,640 | 33.0B INR (≈$396M) | 3 | 51 | |
| 1,641 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) |
| 3 |
| 47 |
| 1,642 | 1.06T KRW (≈$766M) | 3 | 55 |
| 1,643 | 97.4B USD | 3 | 28 |
| 1,644 | 2.6B USD | 3 | 24 |
| 1,645 | 1.7B USD | 3 | 67 |
| 1,646 | 15.6B USD | 3 | 63 |
| 1,647 | 742M USD | 3 | 61 |
| 1,648 | 2.6B USD | 3 | 48 |