Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited
How ASA Gold and Precious Metals Limited stacks up
ASA · against 161 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
18/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #136 of 162 · scores higher than 16% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score17 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including ASA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 18?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital and return on assets, which are weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 87% of peers. Return on invested capital: 0.0% vs peer median 6.3%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 83% of peers. Return on assets: 0.1% vs peer median 2.6%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ASA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ASA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 157 reported | 0.0% | 7.1% | 11% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 84 reported | Not reported | 23.1% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 183 reported | 0.1% | 2.6% | 13% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 176 reported | 72.2% | 10.4% | 97% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 200 reported | 100.0% | 83.0% | 57% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ASA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 566.9B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 2 | 2.7B USD | 98 | 63 | |
| 2 | 31.1B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 4 | 4.2B USD | 97 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2.7B USD | 97 | 58 | |
| 132 | 1.8B USD | 20 | 60 | |
| 132 | 2.5B USD | 20 | 56 | |
| 134 | 1.5B USD | 19 | ||
| 134 | 1.0B USD | 19 | 20 | |
| 136 | 883M USD | 18 | 51 | |
| 136 | 2.1B USD | 18 | ||
| 138 | 3.1B USD | 17 | 36 | |
| 138 | 775M USD | 17 | 28 | |
| 140 | 4.9B USD | 16 | 18 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score