Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Amer Sports, Inc.
How Amer Sports, Inc. stacks up
AS · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
30/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,080 of 1,553 · scores higher than 30% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score156 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including AS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 30?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 68% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 3.0% vs peer median 6.1%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 62% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.3% vs peer median 8.8%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.5% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 3.1% | 4.4% | 40% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 6.7% | 8.8% | 38% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | Not reported | 6.1% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 38.7% | 57.2% | 36% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1,080 | 3.3B CNY (≈$455M) | 30 | 37 | |
| 1,080 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score