Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AS · against 124 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #99 of 125 · scores higher than 20% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score21 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including AS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | AS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 123 reported | 3.1% | 4.6% | 25% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 127 reported | 6.7% | 7.7% | 37% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 67 reported | Not reported | 4.9% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 120 reported | 38.7% | 23.7% | 64% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 2 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 4 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 5 | 70.6B CNY (≈$9.9B) | 92 | 52 | |
| 94 | 12.1B USD | 32 | 57 | |
| 97 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 31 | 51 | |
| 97 | 39.0B AUD (≈$25.7B) | 31 | 60 | |
| 99 | 2.51T JPY (≈$17.1B) | 30 | 71 | |
| 99 | 17.7B USD | 30 | 54 | |
| 101 | 24.6B USD | 29 | 56 | |
| 101 | 9.3B EUR (≈$10.2B) | 29 | 38 | |
| 103 | 17.0B CAD (≈$12.4B) | 28 | 59 | |
| 103 | 22.1B EUR (≈$24.3B) | 28 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score