Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Aramark
How Aramark stacks up
ARMK · against 472 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #238 of 473 · scores higher than 48% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score89 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including ARMK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.7% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.9% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ARMK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ARMK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 468 reported | 2.6% | 3.0% | 43% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | 7.1% | 6.3% | 60% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 430 reported | 3.0% | 3.3% | 45% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 466 reported | 23.6% | 32.3% | 39% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ARMK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 231 | 2.3B USD | 44 | 58 | |
| 231 | 91.3B USD | 44 | 45 | |
| 231 | 8.2B USD | 44 | 61 | |
| 231 | 17.1B USD | 44 | 42 | |
| 238 | 14.4B USD | 43 | 40 | |
| 238 | 1.3B USD | 43 | 48 | |
| 238 | 613M USD | 43 | 24 | |
| 238 | 15.9B USD | 43 | 50 | |
| 238 | 861M USD | 43 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score