Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Aramark
How Aramark stacks up
ARMK · against 445 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
70/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #173 of 446 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score45 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including ARMK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 70?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 5.6% vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 72% of peers. Revenue growth: 11.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 81% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 13.3% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ARMK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ARMK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 462 reported | 11.0% | 8.4% | 60% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 328 reported | 5.6% | 9.2% | 44% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 437 reported | 13.3% | 5.2% | 75% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ARMK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 727M USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 165 | 11.9B USD | 72 | 51 | |
| 170 | 286.8B USD | 71 | 52 | |
| 170 | 12.5B USD | 71 | 56 | |
| 170 | 4.7B USD | 71 | 28 | |
| 173 | 14.4B USD | 70 | 40 | |
| 173 | 7.8B USD | 70 | 82 | |
| 173 | 745M USD | 70 | 36 | |
| 173 | 147.5B USD | 70 | 54 | |
| 173 | 49.3B USD | 70 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score