Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ArcBest Corporation
How ArcBest Corporation stacks up
ARCB · against 577 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #390 of 578 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score70 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including ARCB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Industrials peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 78% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.5% vs peer median 3.8%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 61% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.8% vs peer median 6.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.2% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ARCB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ARCB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 575 reported | 0.5% | 4.4% | 11% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 585 reported | 8.8% | 7.8% | 56% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 192 reported | 5.7% | 4.2% | 63% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 576 reported | 42.2% | 44.4% | 49% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ARCB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 4 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 390 | 23.4B MYR (≈$5.1B) | 41 | 46 | |
| 390 | 20.7B CNY (≈$2.9B) | 41 | 54 | |
| 390 | 17.4B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 41 | 44 | |
| 390 | 21.0B SEK (≈$2.1B) | 41 | 64 | |
| 390 | 3.0B USD | 41 | 24 | |
| 390 | 1.4B EUR (≈$1.5B) | 41 | 42 | |
| 397 | 14.5B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 40 | 67 | |
| 397 | 11.9B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 40 | 33 | |
| 397 | 75.4B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 40 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score